Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Propeller Head Plaza

Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: "Ordinary" magnet wire

Posted by Tony Lauck on October 29, 2010 at 10:56:19:

"It has been proven by two methods: a 7 KHz square wave fidelity test, and a 6 usec narrowest audible time delay test from left ear to right ear. Both show a same approximately 100 KHz to 200 KHz extended brain processing. One shows that hearing fidelity needs to go beyond the limit of "20 KHz" for the spacial fidelity to finish up, between ears that is beyond hearing but is not beyond brain processing speed in comparing signals of both ears delayed from one another.

Do you have a reference to the 7 kHz square wave test?

I don't believe you can equate delay sensitivity of 6 microseconds to bandwidth. For example, the bandwidth of 44.1/16 PCM is limited to 22 kHz, and an apparent time resolution corresponding to the interval between consecutive samples of 22.7 microseconds. However, there is sufficient information to further subdivide this period by a factor of 65536, which yields a time resolution of 346 picoseconds. One can easily see subsample pulse resolution by playing around with an editor and doing a combination of upsampling, downsampling and shifting.