Planar Speaker Asylum

Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

RE: Maggie madness

Posted by josh358 on March 27, 2012 at 09:41:02:
I don't think it would improve the sound quality of the 20.7, though. Just the efficiency. And I know from talking to Wendell that he's as concerned with value in their top-of-the-line speaker as he is in the MMG's. He very much doesn't want the company to lose its value image and become just another manufacturer of Veblen-priced luxury goods, a category that already has lots of good speaker companies in it. This despite the fact that the luxury market is doing quite well right now, since the middle class is stretched by the recession but the rich and particularly super-rich have been doing better than ever.

However, as Jonathan Valin pointed out the other day in his blog, a lot of people are on their case to do a new Tympani. Everyone has fond memories of that amazing midbass. And since they were formerly a part of their line, I don't think it would harm their reputation as a value manufacturer.