Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Absolute Statement

Posted by DkB on January 28, 2004 at 17:33:03:
I wanted to post an objective response to Dalton. However his post did have a rather absolute and sweeping tone to it in stating that SACD's advantages were "not all that great" and that it was a "miniscule improvement."
I thought it would have been nicer if he had qualified that it was his own perception, and not something universally applicable. So I could not restrain myself from stating that for him. Naughty of me, I know!
I agree with Dalton about the "CD layer sounded more dynamic and crisp than the SACD layer" if you hear it in that way. My take is that the dynamism and crispness comes from the aural tension due to digital hardness though.