Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

RE: Agree to disagree.

Posted by josh358 on April 28, 2012 at 06:57:06:

What Tony said.

Check out this web page -- it compares monopole, dipole, and cardioid woofers. Note in particular the graph of the impulse response, all modes considered, near the bottom of the page. The benefits of the dipole diminish as you toe it in until at 45 degrees, it isn't much better than the omni, but I've found that in practice, with the moderate toe-in usually used, dipole bass is significantly smoother than monopole bass.

The downside of dipole bass is that you get backwave cancellation, so need more excursion and amplification for a given SPL. You also need large baffles, although they can be folded for a compact unit.

Another interesting possibility mentioned at the end of the page is to put the omni subs right behind the listener. He says that the variations that then occur are minimum phase, which means response irregularities can be equalized out. This would be effective only for a single listener, though.