Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Quicksilver Phono Stage - How good after tube rolling? - mitch s. 18:23:14 05/01/07 (21)

• Canary Audio CA400 - Dimitry 21:12:20 05/01/07 (0)
• Having modded a couple of Quicksilver amps - Mark Kelly 19:21:58 05/01/07 (17)
• Re: Having modded a couple of Quicksilver amps - rja 17:51:24 05/02/07 (0)
• Cheap Shot? - nightdoggy 09:30:05 05/02/07 (7)
• That may be - Mark Kelly 16:16:10 05/02/07 (0)
• I see you have a lot of Quicksilver gear. Mark stated his reasons - HenryH 10:00:54 05/02/07 (5)
• I disagree Henry, read it again. - nightdoggy 12:50:19 05/02/07 (3)
• Methinks someone's dismissal of someone else's gear - HenryH 12:55:05 05/02/07 (2)
• That's a diversion Henry - nightdoggy 13:08:36 05/02/07 (1)
• I must agree to disagree. Mark made it very clear it was just his opinion - HenryH 13:44:54 05/02/07 (0)
• Yeah, but I've always heard (from owners, dealers, reviews) that QS products are very reliable. nt - Rick W 12:17:38 05/02/07 (0)
• Just curious - unclestu52 20:25:11 05/01/07 (4)
• Underwhelmed - Mark Kelly 21:11:46 05/01/07 (3)
• Re: Underwhelmed - illini_skn 10:39:11 05/02/07 (0)
• Re: Underwhelmed - unclestu52 02:38:33 05/02/07 (0)
• Re: Underwhelmed - mothra 22:30:59 05/01/07 (0)
• Re: Having modded a couple of Quicksilver amps - mosin 19:33:16 05/01/07 (2)
• Webmail - Mark Kelly 19:54:52 05/01/07 (1)
• Re: Webmail - mosin 19:58:25 05/01/07 (0)
• Re: Quicksilver Phono Stage - How good after tube rolling? - tony s 19:16:39 05/01/07 (0)
• The Wright 200 is way less than $2K. Ditto the Hagerman Cornet II. /nt\ - HenryH 19:10:20 05/01/07 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: Quicksilver Phono Stage - How good after tube rolling? - tony s 19:16:39 05/01/07 (0)