Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Anti-skate and heavier tracking force... posted by Mr Blue Sky on August 24, 2016 at 02:52:49:
Which Empire arm do you have? All 3 listed on VE have an antiskate facility, but it is likely that the list is incomplete. The 980 and 990 shown on VE have the standard "weight on a thread" solution.
As John has already pointed out, the physics dictates the requirement for antiskate.
The antiskate force is typically 10% of the downforce. If you choose not to use antiskate (or lack the facility), then as the groove modulation increases in amplitude you will have increasing distortion in the R-ch and correspondingly greater wear on the R-ch scanning surface of the tip i.e uneven wear of the tip.
Regards Anthony
"Beauty is Truth, Truth Beauty.." Keats
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Anti-skate and heavier tracking force... - flood2 03:21:52 08/24/16 (5)
- Many Empire arms have no provision for anti-skate - Dave Pogue 04:53:53 08/24/16 (4)
- RE: Many Empire arms have no provision for anti-skate - flood2 18:14:51 08/24/16 (0)
- Maybe because in that Empire tonearm,... - Lew 06:37:54 08/24/16 (2)
- The Empire 990 tonearm has a antiskate adjustment - Tre' 13:55:00 08/24/16 (1)
- but the 980 does not. (nt) - Tre' 13:57:56 08/24/16 (0)