RE: the whole lot should be 150+

Posted by Goober58 on December 15, 2014 at 09:57:03

In Reply to: the whole lot should be 150+ posted by Penguin on December 15, 2014 at 07:27:52:

From the ad -
1$=1
2$=10
3$=20

assuming $3 for 20 then $150 (50*3) for the set of a thousand

but following the pattern

$4=40
$5=80
$6=160
$7=320
$8=640
$9=1280

So for about $10 one gets them all! Splitting the difference I'm betting he'll let the whole collection go for ($10+$150)/2 = $80 (or less to a good home if someone else hauls).

And even if the buyer generates $2000 in resale from the set I'd be willing to wager in the long run he'll make about $2 an hour for his effort.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Could be a score if you can take the entire lot... - Todd A. 16:22:25 12/14/14 (7)

RE: Could be a score if you can take the entire lot... - Munkie_NL 03:32:59 12/16/14 (0)

RE: Could be a score if you can take the entire lot... - rbolaw 17:52:50 12/14/14 (5)

the whole lot should be 150+ - Penguin 07:27:52 12/15/14 (4)

RE: the whole lot should be 150+ - Goober58 09:57:03 12/15/14 (3)

I wouldn't expect someone to buy them for resale. - Todd A. 16:24:03 12/15/14 (2)

You guys seem to be missing my point - rbolaw 17:58:18 12/15/14 (1)

You're right, of course. - Todd A. 18:35:51 12/15/14 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: the whole lot should be 150+ - Goober58 09:57:03 12/15/14 (3)

I wouldn't expect someone to buy them for resale. - Todd A. 16:24:03 12/15/14 (2)

You guys seem to be missing my point - rbolaw 17:58:18 12/15/14 (1)

You're right, of course. - Todd A. 18:35:51 12/15/14 (0)

RE: the whole lot should be 150+

Post a Message!