Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: If the Shibata were so inferior... posted by Doug G. on November 21, 2014 at 00:05:21:
It's not about whether the design "works" or not. It was the first to solve the problem of the bandwidth required for CD4. There are much better designs which achieve a wider, flatter bandwidth compared to a Shibata. The curving contact line actually means it is actually MORE sensitive to errors in rake angle compared to a Stereohedron (which is also a parabolic design). So it surprises me that manufacturers would choose to use a design that is more demanding in alignment, as people without the knowledge and tools would probably would never hear the true capability of the cartridge! Most of those earlier patents have expired long since, so licensing shouldn't be an issue anymore.
My point was that it seems odd to go back to a design that had flaws which are well known when better designs with equivalent benefits of low surface noise should be available for a similar cost. Having said that, I haven't the slightest idea of the cost of actually cutting these shapes...
Regards Anthony
"Beauty is Truth, Truth Beauty.." Keats
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: If the Shibata were so inferior... - flood2 01:51:36 11/21/14 (5)
- RE: If the Shibata were so inferior... - John Elison 08:36:25 11/21/14 (4)
- RE: If the Shibata were so inferior... - neobop 12:38:35 11/21/14 (2)
- RE: If the Shibata were so inferior... - flood2 13:50:46 11/21/14 (1)
- I would bet that it is cost driven too - richardl 12:57:22 11/24/14 (0)
- RE: If the Shibata were so inferior... - flood2 12:37:06 11/21/14 (0)