Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Denon 301 Mk II - Holy Cow! posted by flood2 on October 27, 2014 at 15:10:05:
> Just out of interest, how does the sound of the DL-S1 differ from the DL-301?
I don't really know. It has been more than 10-years since I played the DL-301/II and I haven't listened to a recording in a very long time. I put the DL-301/II on my Thorens after playing my original AT-OC9 for about five years. I thought the two sounded very similar. The AT-OC9 had a solid beryllium cantilever and a hyper-elliptical stylus whereas the DL-301/II had a hollow aluminum cantilever and a special elliptical stylus. A friend who had some of my recordings said he thought the AT-OC9 sounded just a bit better than the DL-301/II but I thought they sounded almost identical.
The DL-S1 in my system when loaded heavily sounds really nice, smooth, detailed and very musical. If not loaded heavily it sounds bright and a bit strident in the highs. I didn't like it at first until I tried loading it with 20-ohms and that did the trick for me. Unfortunately, it is a very low output cartridge and when loaded with 20-ohms it needs a phono section with at least 75-dB gain. The high-gain setting on my XOno provides 75-dB gain.
It also sounds good with a Bob's Devices CM-1131 SUT, which loads it pretty heavily in its 1:40 turns-ratio configuration. That's what I use when playing it in my Technics SL-1200 Mk2 turntable with a Yaqin MS-22B MM phono stage. It really sound good using that SUT.
Best regards,
John Elison
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Denon 301 Mk II - Holy Cow! - John Elison 22:00:52 10/27/14 (1)
- RE: Denon 301 Mk II - Holy Cow! - ctbarker32 20:13:12 10/28/14 (0)