Vinyl Asylum Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Short signal paths, but not sound-optimized? posted by CometCKO on August 26, 2014 at 10:06:28:
"I do not think the form-factor of an op-amp is any limitation to sound quality."
Actually there are issues. Big deal, there are issues with everything especially tubes.
But back to op-amps three pop to mind...
-Flexure sensitivity: The die could be used as a phono cartridge, stress alters offset voltages and generates internal voltage shifts.
-Thermal feedback: Clever die layout balances the thermal offset but not the loop gain variations due to carrier mobility changes.
-Noise/GBW tradeoff: Bigger geometries have less noise as it tends to average out, smaller geometries have wider bandwidth because they have fewer "strays" but individual carriers become a bigger part of the energy.
Perfection is a limit, not a possibility so you do the best you can with what you got. Good Engineers get good results. But that doesn't mean that tomorrow they won't do better or that things are bound to improve. That's just life...
One area where I do expect to see improvements is psychometrics. If we could really sort out how we hear and process music and our sensitivities to noise and distortion then the divergence between metrics and experience should substantially reduce making specifications a lot more useful. Actually without any additional knowledge components could easily be more fully specified which would really help audiophiles, but the former would do more for everyone.
Regards, Rick
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Short signal paths, but not sound-optimized? - rick_m 10:51:21 08/26/14 (3)
- You make a good point! - CometCKO 11:03:19 08/26/14 (2)
- RE: You make a good point! - flood2 17:44:31 08/26/14 (0)
- RE: You make a good point! - rick_m 12:59:14 08/26/14 (0)