Topic - Informed ebay seller that LP described as original isn't original and got this interesting reply - nutbatter 21:00:51 07/30/12 (35)

• I own a copy like the one pictured....... - groovelover 07:20:15 08/02/12 (1)
• RE: I own a copy like the one pictured....... - nutbatter 13:38:55 08/03/12 (0)
• It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - nutbatter 15:14:07 07/31/12 (11)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - Tao 20:55:18 07/31/12 (1)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - nutbatter 21:05:50 07/31/12 (0)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - Tedmc 16:19:58 07/31/12 (8)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - nutbatter 20:37:49 07/31/12 (6)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - Tedmc 21:32:20 07/31/12 (5)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - nutbatter 22:25:49 07/31/12 (2)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - Tedmc 23:04:01 07/31/12 (1)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - nutbatter 09:15:02 08/01/12 (0)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - nutbatter 22:04:27 07/31/12 (0)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - nutbatter 22:00:11 07/31/12 (0)
• RE: It's listed in Goldmine (Third edition, 2002) as standard, original issue. Pic included. - Tao 18:15:32 07/31/12 (0)
• RE: Informed ebay seller that LP described as original isn't original and got this interesting reply - MusicHead 2 10:37:20 07/31/12 (0)
• A picture is worth 1,000 words - vinyl phanatic 09:18:37 07/31/12 (0)
• I've never understood the "original label" idea. - rbolaw 07:34:03 07/31/12 (0)
• you made an assumption, "original" does not have a standard meaning in the LP world - bwb 06:39:39 07/31/12 (8)
• "Original" DOES have a standard meaning and a very clear understanding in the LP world... - musetap 08:50:21 07/31/12 (5)
• you seem to be in the minority, or at least there is enough to say your take on it isn't universal - bwb 10:53:11 07/31/12 (3)
• So, should read: you made an assumption, "original" does not have a standard meaning in the eBay world?...N/T - musetap 12:05:44 07/31/12 (0)
• You're correct - mt10425 11:19:20 07/31/12 (1)
• Even if they are trustworthy they may be ignorant - bwb 11:48:26 07/31/12 (0)
• Agree - mt10425 10:05:45 07/31/12 (0)
• RE: you made an assumption, "original" does not have a standard meaning in the LP world - Biff 07:04:20 07/31/12 (1)
• RE: you made an assumption, "original" does not have a standard meaning in the LP world - bwb 10:55:15 07/31/12 (0)
• RE: Informed ebay seller that LP described as original isn't original and got this interesting reply - Biff 05:58:44 07/31/12 (0)
• No Reprise issued 2 Tone pressings of Benefit - Tedmc 23:39:45 07/30/12 (0)
• RE: Informed ebay seller that LP described as original isn't original and got this interesting reply - Tao 22:47:26 07/30/12 (5)
• RE: Informed ebay seller that LP described as original isn't original and got this interesting reply - Monchi 05:31:54 07/31/12 (4)
• RE: Informed ebay seller that LP described as original isn't original and got this interesting reply - Palustris 09:43:31 08/02/12 (3)
• RE: Informed ebay seller that LP described as original isn't original and got this interesting reply - nutbatter 22:01:59 08/03/12 (2)
• RE: Informed ebay seller that LP described as original isn't original and got this interesting reply - Palustris 09:22:02 08/04/12 (1)
• Company records, serial #s, trademarks... - nutbatter 20:46:08 08/05/12 (0)
• That's an original answer and piss-poor justification...N/T - musetap 21:05:45 07/30/12 (0)