Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Because it is NOT valuable musical information posted by Jon Risch on June 23, 2015 at 18:49:25:
Jon,Please answer three questions regarding your remarkable comment.
First, why did you not use your authority, as both a former loudspeaker designer and moderator, to previously warn everybody of the dangers of using a single pair of panels on the inside before launching a broadside on a later thread that doubles up on the concept on the inside and the outside?
Second, have you ever TESTED the music quality outcome from two pairs of panels as pictured above that you so emphatically condemn and against which you issue such an unequivocal warning as if it were some potential safety hazard?
Third, how can a greater volume of harnessed amplified information and dynamic energy fail to be valuable if it's arrival avoids detectable frequency-cancellation? Please do advise me because I can hear the testing answer on site and am told that I have particularly good ears by the manager of the local high-end audio store and another discriminating audiophile.
Thank you.
DG
Edits: 06/23/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Because it is NOT valuable musical information - Dryginger2 19:27:26 06/23/15 (2)
- RE: Because it is NOT valuable musical information - Jon Risch 18:24:29 06/24/15 (1)
- RE: Because it is NOT valuable musical information - Dryginger2 21:31:22 06/24/15 (0)