Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: Destructive and constructive interference posted by DragonEars on April 21, 2015 at 00:24:33:
1. Signals cancel if 180 degrees apart. Isn't a mono signal essentially that? Shouldn't, say a strong vocal, carry equal amplitudes on both channels? That's what gives the center image, right?2.Sound waves not reinforcing? How do ports work on a cabinet?
3. This tweak enables your BRAIN to combine the left Right signals. Now doesn't that occur with headphones? If so, why can't it work for speakers?
3. Decades of common knowledge? Yes, but my placement of the center panel corners facing forward is definitely NOT like a rack or cabinet. I am reflecting the separate left/ right signals back out into the room into the listeners ears, for the most part. Think reflectors in a concert hall.
Simply put, the tweak greatly increases the center focus. However, it does not only help center imaging but also lateral placement in a very 3D manner. Listening to the complete Phantom in the opening auction scene reveals detail of the echoes off the stage and the auctioneer's gavel is extremely realistic.You can hear layers of music over dubbed upon each other in quite a natural way for many recordings.
Of course the angle of the two panels must be experimented with, but once you reach the sort of ideal position the sound is fantastic.
You need not try it, BTW. I have employed this tweek for well over two decades noe. All I can say is that it works
Edits: 04/21/15 04/21/15 04/21/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Questions to ponder - unclestu 21:45:29 04/21/15 (30)
- RE: Questions to ponder - pictureguy 18:15:24 05/22/15 (1)
- I disagree - unclestu 18:54:53 05/22/15 (0)
- RE: Questions to ponder - Dryginger2 21:41:25 04/24/15 (21)
- Great !! - unclestu 14:17:19 04/25/15 (20)
- RE: Great !! - Dryginger2 15:21:32 04/25/15 (19)
- RE: Great !! - unclestu 16:05:22 04/25/15 (18)
- RE: Great !! - Dryginger2 16:02:58 05/04/15 (15)
- RE: Great !! - jhrlrd 09:16:54 05/22/15 (5)
- RE: Great !! - Dryginger2 14:44:02 05/24/15 (4)
- RE: Great !! - unclestu 15:29:01 05/24/15 (3)
- RE: Great !! - Dryginger2 17:22:47 05/24/15 (2)
- RE: Great !! - jhrlrd 09:58:21 05/25/15 (1)
- RE: Great !! - Dryginger2 10:25:04 05/25/15 (0)
- Looks great - unclestu 22:07:01 05/04/15 (8)
- RE: Looks great - Dryginger2 08:57:24 05/06/15 (7)
- RE: Looks great - unclestu 22:56:05 05/06/15 (6)
- RE: Looks great - Dryginger2 11:49:01 05/07/15 (5)
- I believe you are correct.... - unclestu 20:03:45 05/07/15 (2)
- RE: I believe you are correct.... - davem1 13:52:15 05/21/15 (0)
- RE: I believe you are correct.... - Dryginger2 16:35:31 05/20/15 (0)
- RE: Looks great - aupiho 12:31:19 05/07/15 (1)
- RE: Looks great - Dryginger2 10:22:42 05/08/15 (0)
- RE: Great !! - davem1 17:54:16 04/26/15 (1)
- RE: Great !! - unclestu 18:18:22 04/26/15 (0)
- Ponders to question - DragonEars 00:34:24 04/22/15 (5)
- RE: Ponders to question - unclestu 00:55:17 04/22/15 (4)
- RE: Ponders to question - aupiho 09:40:27 04/22/15 (3)
- RE: Ponders to question - unclestu 11:44:33 04/22/15 (2)
- RE: Ponders to question - aupiho 05:17:56 04/25/15 (1)
- comments - unclestu 14:05:58 04/25/15 (0)