|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
|
|
Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Contradiction? posted by madisonears on March 27, 2015 at 20:19:36:
Well, you certainly show your feathers. No matter.In my systems removing the covers have always improved the sound. A discussion of this including DG was held a while ago. This had to do with captured EMF fields. Removing the covers certainly reduces a lot of the EMF generated and captured by the chassis. Removing the covers for me, has always resulted in cleaner, more pristine highs, with the greater resultant ambience and three dimensionality. OF course different set ups may differ in results.
And nothing was mentioned about excess heat. You inserted that. I happen to like to run my gear as cool as possible.
As for dust on the lens, enough dust and it doesn't matter if the machine has a damped cover or not. To my thinking, a certain amount of practicality rears its head.
As for the photo I doubt if it is a current photo. No brass screws, for example...
But I do not prowl the net trying to point out seeming contradictions. IT does not really help the advancement of audio.
But nuff said...
If you're going to insert comments though, please get them correct. I have NEVER advocated cooking crystals, LOL!!!!!
Edits: 03/27/15 03/27/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]