What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand?

Especially considering that you have no idea whether it's viable or not.

Here's some facts and a question for you (don't worry, it's simple):

- many people consider this solution viable, and use it for years with great results;
- I personally made sure that it provides sonic benefits;
- respectable industry figures, like A. Von Schweikert, for instance, consider it advantageous.

Question: When some random dumbass on the web, who clearly never even tried it, posts idiotic condescending lecture against it - what am I supposed to think?

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Bi-amping issue - carcass93 12:22:51 01/14/15 (12)

RE: Bi-amping issue - Ryelands 02:52:56 01/15/15 (3)

Correct for phase - neolith 06:58:35 01/18/15 (1)

RE: Correct for phase - Ryelands 07:11:08 01/18/15 (0)

Yep, the pre is still Lampizator. - carcass93 09:04:39 01/15/15 (0)

RE: Bi-amping issue - stehno 17:05:33 01/14/15 (5)

I was hoping to avoid nonsensical lectures like this here. - carcass93 17:19:05 01/14/15 (4)

RE: I was hoping to avoid nonsensical lectures like this here. - stehno 17:40:54 01/14/15 (3)

What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand? - carcass93 20:07:58 01/14/15 (2)

RE: What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand? - stehno 20:52:47 01/14/15 (1)

Both of you, Chill out! - Jon Risch 21:32:36 01/14/15 (0)

RE: Bi-amping issue - 6bq5 13:10:09 01/14/15 (0)

RE: Bi-amping issue - 6bq5 13:09:46 01/14/15 (0)

Follow Ups

What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand? - carcass93 20:07:58 01/14/15 (2)

RE: What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand? - stehno 20:52:47 01/14/15 (1)

Both of you, Chill out! - Jon Risch 21:32:36 01/14/15 (0)

The moderators feel that allowing this thread to continue, even though it may hold useful information, will wind up creating more trouble than it solves, and thereby detract from the purpose of this forum.

This is not the appropriate venue for discussion of this matter, and we ask that those with an interest in the subject, take it elsewhere (e.g. private e-mail).

No further follow-ups will be considered.

Thank you for your support of the Asylum.