RE: Bi-amping issue

Posted by stehno (M) on January 14, 2015 at 17:05:33

In Reply to: Bi-amping issue posted by carcass93 on January 14, 2015 at 12:22:51:

Ya' know, everything you do to your system involves risk mgmt decision making.

Then again, maybe you don't know.

Jeepers. If you're not happy with either set of amps, just sell them and buy a single amp or pair of mono blocks that perform more to your liking across the entire frequency spectrum.

You're certainly not going to uncover some lost world of musical bliss by unnecessarily complicating what must be a very simple system configuration (if performance is your goal).

Don't think, "More is always more."

Rather, think, "Less is always more."and your brain, your ears, and your wallet will thank you.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Bi-amping issue - carcass93 12:22:51 01/14/15 (12)

RE: Bi-amping issue - Ryelands 02:52:56 01/15/15 (3)

Correct for phase - neolith 06:58:35 01/18/15 (1)

RE: Correct for phase - Ryelands 07:11:08 01/18/15 (0)

Yep, the pre is still Lampizator. - carcass93 09:04:39 01/15/15 (0)

RE: Bi-amping issue - stehno 17:05:33 01/14/15 (5)

I was hoping to avoid nonsensical lectures like this here. - carcass93 17:19:05 01/14/15 (4)

RE: I was hoping to avoid nonsensical lectures like this here. - stehno 17:40:54 01/14/15 (3)

What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand? - carcass93 20:07:58 01/14/15 (2)

RE: What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand? - stehno 20:52:47 01/14/15 (1)

Both of you, Chill out! - Jon Risch 21:32:36 01/14/15 (0)

RE: Bi-amping issue - 6bq5 13:10:09 01/14/15 (0)

RE: Bi-amping issue - 6bq5 13:09:46 01/14/15 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Bi-amping issue - stehno 17:05:33 01/14/15 (5)

I was hoping to avoid nonsensical lectures like this here. - carcass93 17:19:05 01/14/15 (4)

RE: I was hoping to avoid nonsensical lectures like this here. - stehno 17:40:54 01/14/15 (3)

What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand? - carcass93 20:07:58 01/14/15 (2)

RE: What part of "shift focus from "viability" of the idea of passive biamping" did you not understand? - stehno 20:52:47 01/14/15 (1)

Both of you, Chill out! - Jon Risch 21:32:36 01/14/15 (0)

The moderators feel that allowing this thread to continue, even though it may hold useful information, will wind up creating more trouble than it solves, and thereby detract from the purpose of this forum.

This is not the appropriate venue for discussion of this matter, and we ask that those with an interest in the subject, take it elsewhere (e.g. private e-mail).

No further follow-ups will be considered.

Thank you for your support of the Asylum.