Tweakers' Asylum Tweaks for systems, rooms and Do It Yourself (DIY) help. FAQ. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Hi Jim..... posted by Awe-d-o-file on December 1, 2014 at 12:14:28:
Awe-d : you asked about compliance, so I thought I'd give a short explanation. (Yes, I agree that soft footers eat treble. And rubbery/springy footers smear by storing energy and releasing in the future. But also hard footers have their own problems, for instance a bunch of resonances, which can make them shrill.)
The overall design goals were to make them hard-coupled in the vertical (up down) direction, with no compliance; but in the other two planes, laterally, there is a small amount of movement allowed which is damped with constrained layer damping.
This is realized using two variable-density top and bottom plates, kept apart by separators that allow some lateral sliding. This is also bound with a lossy elastomer to form a constrained layer damping system.
They are topped with a lead ball. Why lead? Well I tried other materials and lead sounded the most musical. Lead normally does not have a great sound when used (randomly) on audio systems - it can make things seem slow of muffled. But in this application it just works. It's coated with a thin layer of spray-on rubber which is removable. The rubber is so thin that it has virtually no effect on SQ
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Hi Jim..... - beautox 19:04:42 12/01/14 (1)
- RE: Hi Jim..... - Awe-d-o-file 12:52:40 12/03/14 (0)