Tweakers' Asylum

I believe they do have useful information, sort of.

72.229.167.158


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Tweakers' Asylum ]

I think that they are a little disorganized and also suffer from the communication problem of many technical people: having a difficult time leaving their world of specialized jargon to explain the operation of their devices to an outsider.

The article linked below shows graphs of the initial surge, and the resulting waveforms from the EP2000 and two competing products. I believe that the action of the 2050 is similar to the 2000.
http://www.ep2000.com/Templates/downloads/ESAreport.pdf

Here is a link to the performance info. of the 2500 which I also beleive is similar to the 2050: http://www.ep2000.com/Templates/downloads/EP2500CutSht.pdf

The response time is listed as instantaneous and the key event response time (whatever that means) is listed as one nano second. This would lead me to believe that it would be able to clean up radio frequency noise under one gigahertz.

I don't claim to be able to understand much of this, but they seem to want to share their results as well as they are able.



Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Tweakers' Asylum ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]