72.229.167.158
In Reply to: RE: Their website is woefully short of useful information posted by racerguy on May 26, 2008 at 08:09:57
I think that they are a little disorganized and also suffer from the communication problem of many technical people: having a difficult time leaving their world of specialized jargon to explain the operation of their devices to an outsider.
The article linked below shows graphs of the initial surge, and the resulting waveforms from the EP2000 and two competing products. I believe that the action of the 2050 is similar to the 2000.
http://www.ep2000.com/Templates/downloads/ESAreport.pdf
Here is a link to the performance info. of the 2500 which I also beleive is similar to the 2050: http://www.ep2000.com/Templates/downloads/EP2500CutSht.pdf
The response time is listed as instantaneous and the key event response time (whatever that means) is listed as one nano second. This would lead me to believe that it would be able to clean up radio frequency noise under one gigahertz.
I don't claim to be able to understand much of this, but they seem to want to share their results as well as they are able.
Follow Ups: