Re: That indeed, would be very effective. [nt] - alan m. kafton

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Positive-Feedback Review on the Clever Little Clock...... - Soundideas 12:59:00 01/25/06 (41)

it works based on .... - bobp 12:08:02 01/30/06 (0)

I thought the article was a joke ... but then I recalled the Tice Clock rip-off from long ago (deja vu again !) - Richard BassNut Greene 08:24:32 01/27/06 (4)

An alleged rip-off is not necessarily a knockoff. - soulfood 08:55:02 01/27/06 (3)

Why do I detect a high degree of illogicality here? - David Aiken 12:52:52 01/27/06 (2)

Re: Why do I detect a high degree of illogicality here? - soulfood 15:04:13 01/27/06 (1)

Politely sarcastic response, a change from the ordinary. Nice work, thank you. nt - clarkjohnsen 02:40:25 01/28/06 (0)

i will say it again for the naysayers/nonbelievers. - snkby 10:28:19 01/26/06 (10)

VTS Tuning Dots from Marigo Audio ??? - Soundideas 21:56:41 01/26/06 (1)

Yes, they work great in my room. [nt] - Wellfed 08:44:53 01/27/06 (0)

Am I closed minded or more open minded... - Chris_F 11:14:12 01/26/06 (7)

How about we DON'T rant, call anyone names, or generate badwill. How 'bout... - jeffreybehr 15:23:05 01/26/06 (6)

Re: How about we DON'T rant, call anyone names, or generate badwill. How 'bout... - David Aiken 13:16:54 01/27/06 (0)

The other end of the stick - kingdaddy 17:16:26 01/26/06 (3)

kingdaddy,that is really funny stuff ! - Keith Lockwood 09:20:02 01/27/06 (0)

Excuse me, but... aren't you the one doing the ridiculing here? nt - clarkjohnsen 23:19:27 01/26/06 (0)

You're right that there are a bunch of rude, mean-spirited folk here... - jeffreybehr 19:59:16 01/26/06 (0)

I agree - Tuckers 15:49:59 01/26/06 (0)

Who will be first - Wlutke 09:36:06 01/26/06 (0)

Well..... - kingdaddy 09:32:27 01/26/06 (1)

Re: Well..... - Squonk 13:32:30 01/26/06 (0)

Peter Belt stuff - drdna 07:50:17 01/26/06 (0)

Re: Positive-Feedback Review on the Clever Little Clock...... - welly 03:09:37 01/26/06 (18)

clarification - drclark 07:52:53 01/26/06 (17)

Working memory... - Wellfed 21:16:31 01/31/06 (0)

Re: clarification - soulfood 11:04:16 01/26/06 (15)

affect... effect... - drclark 12:38:25 01/26/06 (0)

I WISH EVERYBODY WOULD STOP writing "effect" when "affect" is correct. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:15:03 01/26/06 (13)

This sub-thread reads like a Monty Python skit...nt - darkmoebius 01:23:43 02/01/06 (0)

I could be wrong, but isn't it just that "affect" is a verb and "effect" is a noun? -nt- - TopPop 23:02:04 01/26/06 (3)

No, each is both but they swap meanings. - Mark Kelly 03:05:19 01/27/06 (0)

Basically.. But then we have, "lacks affect" and "effects a change". nt - clarkjohnsen 23:11:22 01/26/06 (1)

Yes, and those mean 'lacks influence' and 'causes a change'. Both synomyms are also nouns and verbs. (NT) - jeffreybehr 08:57:14 01/27/06 (0)

Don't say English is your first language... - SysInfo 20:33:36 01/26/06 (1)

See my note above. nt - clarkjohnsen 23:25:27 01/26/06 (0)

Re: That indeed, would be very effective. [nt] - alan m. kafton 18:37:07 01/26/06 (5)

or affective...NT - drclark 18:49:51 01/26/06 (4)

Re: Only if you're affected. [nt] - alan m. kafton 20:32:15 01/26/06 (3)

By the Wood effect? nt - clarkjohnsen 23:26:36 01/26/06 (2)

Re: By the stainless steel affect. [nt] - alan m. kafton 23:33:21 01/26/06 (1)

Re: Or, by the Ben Affleck. [nt] - alan m. kafton 11:35:39 01/27/06 (0)

Clearly the writers at Positive Feedback are outta their freakin' gourds. nt - clarkjohnsen 23:49:09 01/25/06 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: That indeed, would be very effective. [nt] - alan m. kafton 18:37:07 01/26/06 (5)

or affective...NT - drclark 18:49:51 01/26/06 (4)

Re: Only if you're affected. [nt] - alan m. kafton 20:32:15 01/26/06 (3)

By the Wood effect? nt - clarkjohnsen 23:26:36 01/26/06 (2)

Re: By the stainless steel affect. [nt] - alan m. kafton 23:33:21 01/26/06 (1)

Re: Or, by the Ben Affleck. [nt] - alan m. kafton 11:35:39 01/27/06 (0)