Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? posted by Eli Duttman on October 2, 2015 at 13:35:36:
Eli,
This is something I've been wondering about.
Were tubes made in any of the Philips owned plants that weren't "very good stuff"?
I mean, didn't all the plants have to live up to the high Philips standards?
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - Tre' 16:12:42 10/03/15 (9)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - Cleantimestream 02:23:12 10/04/15 (8)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - rusiee 20:42:38 10/08/15 (4)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - rosendds@frontiernet.net 14:54:29 10/10/15 (3)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - rusiee 00:08:44 10/11/15 (2)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - rosendds@frontiernet.net 05:05:02 10/11/15 (1)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - rusiee 05:19:31 10/11/15 (0)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - Tre' 08:07:28 10/04/15 (2)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - Eli Duttman 08:48:23 10/04/15 (1)
- RE: 12AT7/ECC81 - Amperex or Mullard? - Orchardist 15:27:20 10/04/15 (0)