Tubes Asylum Questions about tubes and gear that glows. FAQ |
|
In Reply to: RE: Well, that didn't take very long... posted by Jim McShane on February 3, 2015 at 12:29:52:
I described my cleaning and testing procedure in great detail. Maybe you're just trying to stress your point. You do it often and with good reason. Believe me, many folks, including myself, very much appreciate your generous sharing of information on this forum.
Okay, I just finished the same experiment on V2 of the Cole. Same results, just not as loud (one less gain stage). And three of these four failures came from the Herron, each from a different position. So I would say that it would be quite a coincidence that the same pin(s) in five different tube positions from two different components are all still dirty or whatever after I cleaned them.
There is absolutely no doubt, after this discussion, that five of the twelve new Genalex 6922 tubes have failed in less than 400 hours. The fact that you have sold 1000s without any returns for this issue is somewhat confounding. Perhaps it's because this type of failure occurs over time, well after any reasonable return period. None of the bad tubes failed in less than 100 hours, which, with my listening habits, would be a couple of months at the earliest.
All this talk and still no clue as to what's going on. My conclusion, based on my experience, is that these tubes are not very reliable. Sad, because they sound great. Prior to these I used new production EH 6922 tubes in the Herron. Never had this type of failure. Very reliable but not nearly as good sounding as the Genalex in this application.
Open up your mind, in pours the trash. - Meat Puppets, 1987
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I don't think you read my posts... - Vinyl Valet 13:34:20 02/03/15 (1)
- RE: I don't think you read my posts... - Jim McShane 14:30:32 02/03/15 (0)