|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
|
|
|
Speaker Asylum General speaker questions for audio and home theater. |
|
In Reply to: Re: If you mean the original Ceramique 3... posted by applejack on July 26, 2002 at 10:51:02:
Actually I meant to ask you to avoid the “bass issues†but I forgot to write it down in my question. I am one of those guys who believe that better do not have any bass then to have it improperly implemented. Ceramique 3 dose not go very low and it is VERY good. (The bottom should be implemented by different means anyway.) Ceramique 3's stops at very the reasonable point considering the typical room applications, a way the port used and many others reasons. The monitors should not do deeper then 50-70Hz. The Eidolon’s attempt to go lower actually was a mistake and it screwed them up. I understand why the Eidolon’s parents did that “fast but oily†bass. They should stop to target the Eidolons to the Spectral market and stop to “bassolubricate†that easy-sellable High Resolution BS. I find the Ceramique 3 results are more interesting then Eidolon or at least the 2-way Ceramique has fewer problems. I just can’t believe that they went form $6.5K to $17K.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I do not which one the original. I mean the 2-ways Ceramique. - Romy 11:32:15 07/26/02 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
