In Reply to: I always like the original CDM1 better than any of the newer... posted by Mike on January 3, 2002 at 16:19:30:
I have some old stuff that I wanted to upgrade now (old Arcam Alpha 3 integrated, Micromega Junior CDP). I know that they are not in the same class as the speakers, so I started borrowing good quality integrated amps mentioned in the original post. I also have Magnum Dynalab FT101-A (recently realligned and brought up to specs by Magnum Dynalab) that I intend to keep. I also planned to buy a good CDP like Arcam Diva CD92 (originally wanted Musical Fidelity A3CD but found it was too cold and clinical for me when I borrowed it).I too thought about tubes but the problem with CDM1SE is that it lacks what I would call 'basic clarity', a property that is required when mating with tubes if one is to avoid too dull a sound. My experience with Audio Analogue Pucinni is exactly that - there was smoothness and richness but no 'light from within' - too lush. Funny enough, Classe CAP-101 was almost 'it' - it was fast and moved CDM1SE with ease while still retaining smoothness and warmth. But I kept thinking that there was persistent coloration, a 'rose tint' to the sound that stayed regardless of the recording.
Arcam A85 was a very good match, but my desire to change is based on the realisation that all the amps and sources I tried can only modify the sound around the basic parameters set by the speakers.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: I always like the original CDM1 better than any of the newer... - dejan 16:43:34 01/03/02 (3)
- Plus, Classe CAP-101 gets too hot - dejan 16:49:38 01/03/02 (2)
- I guess we have differing sonic opinions... - Mike 07:52:06 01/05/02 (1)
- Re: I guess we have differing sonic opinions... - dejan 11:37:30 01/05/02 (0)