In Reply to: RE: Some are and some aren't, as implied in scores of professional reviews posted by RGA on September 4, 2016 at 20:58:44:
I think that some reviewers hate to post negative comments in reviews if they can possibly help it. So they tend to publish full-blown reviews of products that have cleared the hurdles of positive preliminary mini auditions or investigations.
Yes, it might be helpful (for us) if they plastered the name of every under-achieving component on the wall for all to see, but doing so might also be bad for the industry in general. Better to highlight the names of good performers and simply ignore the names of bad ones?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Why reviewers won't be more specific about names. - genungo 01:58:16 09/05/16 (3)
- RE: Why reviewers won't be more specific about names. - RGA 20:00:57 09/05/16 (0)
- RE: Why reviewers won't be more specific about names. - tincup 10:57:33 09/05/16 (1)
- That is news to me - genungo 12:52:02 09/05/16 (0)