RE: Monacor DT-350NF

Posted by Dave_K on August 8, 2016 at 04:50:15

In Reply to: RE: Monacor DT-350NF posted by vulejov on August 5, 2016 at 08:48:20:

Is the top graph of distortion with crossover using the same driver & crossover as in your first post? It looks flatter in the top graph. Your fist post showed a 5 dB dip in the response at 6k relative to peaks at 3700 and 9-10K. The variation seems less in this distortion plot even with less smoothing. I'm just curious because it's not often that a driver gets flatter as you increase the level from 85 to 95 dB.

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Monacor DT-350NF - vulejov 04:55:38 08/04/16 (20)

Usable from 2.7 to 20k, crap from 1.5 to 2.7 k even though..... - Awe-d-o-file 08:54:50 08/07/16 (1)

RE: Usable from 2.7 to 20k, crap from 1.5 to 2.7 k even though..... - vulejov 10:42:50 08/07/16 (0)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - airtime 07:18:52 08/04/16 (17)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - Awe-d-o-file 15:52:14 08/04/16 (15)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - airtime 07:45:43 08/05/16 (13)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - Awe-d-o-file 11:31:50 08/05/16 (10)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - vulejov 23:33:35 08/05/16 (9)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - Awe-d-o-file 06:33:23 08/06/16 (8)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - airtime 07:35:17 08/06/16 (7)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - Awe-d-o-file 14:50:50 08/06/16 (6)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - vulejov 22:21:01 08/06/16 (4)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - Awe-d-o-file 08:51:07 08/07/16 (2)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - Dave_K 04:40:29 08/08/16 (1)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - airtime 06:59:27 08/08/16 (0)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - airtime 07:28:18 08/07/16 (0)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - airtime 19:10:47 08/06/16 (0)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - vulejov 08:48:20 08/05/16 (1)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - Dave_K 04:50:15 08/08/16 (0)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - vulejov 06:08:33 08/05/16 (0)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - vulejov 08:10:05 08/04/16 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: Monacor DT-350NF - Dave_K 04:50:15 08/08/16 (0)

RE: Monacor DT-350NF

Post a Message!