In Reply to: Spendor: why "seamless" posted by dave789 on July 9, 2016 at 11:40:31:
My guess is they are talking about the integration between drive units via the crossover. Ive never seen seamless used in regard to dispersion and off axis response
ET
ET
"If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking till you do suck seed" - Curly Howard 1936
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Spendor: why "seamless" - Awe-d-o-file 15:13:06 07/09/16 (2)
- RE: Spendor: why "seamless" - 91derlust 19:28:26 07/09/16 (0)
- RE: Spendor: why "seamless" - mlsstl 16:49:24 07/09/16 (0)