In Reply to: RE: If we assume posted by Presto on May 15, 2015 at 10:44:32:
The REFERENCE and starting point is a single channel of amplification and passive speaker level crossover per channel. A very large %age of stereo guys start and STOP right there.
Phase 2 is passive biamp using the speakers internal crossover
Phase 3 is either active or passive Line Level crossove which is where potential benefits REALLY pile up.
I think the 'efficiency' gain of a LL crossover comes from the out of band signals your amps are no longer asked to amplify. This, according to the ESP article, can amount to a maximum of about 3db. Roughly 2x the amp power, compared to the 'passive' biamped system. Given my panels low /mid 80s sensitivity, I'll take every watt I can get.
The drawings in the ESP article which show a HF and LF O-Scope 'trace' clearly indicate that the amp will Voltage Clip at about the same point as a single amp of the same power. I'll go with ESP on this.
I don't think we disagree about going to a Line Level crossover. That is my ultimate goal and the reason I went to a pair of stereo amps for my panels. And since my runs are short, I'm not overly worried about the PLLXO's inability to drive long runs of cable and its internal losses. Since each amp will have its own crossover, it will be locaed right AT the amp. From the crossover TO the amp may require 12" jumpers, certainly nothing longer. I can Duplicate, pretty closely, the crossover which came with the panels. Most of the Active crossovers I've see are high order and not generally to my liking. I'm not equipped to do a major crossover reengineering project for my panels. Most reports I've read say that 24db/octave filters don't necessarily sound 'right', anyway. I'd consider an active LL crossover using opamps, IF I could find a 6db / 12db octave schematic to evaluate.
Too much is never enough
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: If we assume - pictureguy 12:16:23 05/15/15 (2)
- RE: If we assume - Presto 00:02:41 05/16/15 (1)
- RE: If we assume - pictureguy 01:00:29 05/16/15 (0)