Hi,
In comparative listening to these two speakers over about a year's time, a question has come up for me upon which some of you might care to comment. It concerns overall sound and onset transients.
The overall quality is a bit softer, gentler, slightly less forceful presentation from the Quads that reduces tension and allows for a very pleasant listening session. It seems a bit more diffused-sounding. In general, the B&Ws have more detail. I simply hear more content with them than with the ESL-63s. However, this additional content is accompanied by a bit harder-sounding onset transients, a more forward presentation and, I would have to say, a bit more stressful listening experience at times.
In theory, it seems to me that the lighter, faster diaphragms of the electrostat ought to produce a faster, cleaner onset of sound, but that does not seem to be the case. It leaves me wondering whether the B&Ws are simply overly-crisp and the Quads accurate or the reverse--that the B&Ws are accurate and the Quads overly diffuse? Or might this be due to the larger radiating surface of the Quad's diaphragms?
As an aside, I also found bass performance interesting. I listened to the bass tracks of Stereophile's Test CD # 2 bass decade warble tones through the two speakers. Without the B&W Bass Alignment filter in the circuit, the Quads produced lower bass than did the B&Ws! With the Bass Alignment filter in the circuit, the B&Ws bass performance was equal to the Quads. Here I am speaking only of the audibility of these deep bass test tones, not the quality of the bass when reproducing music where the B&Ws have a more robust, forceful quality. This surprised and interested me because Quads are almost universally dissed for having "no bass". I have always found Quad bass, while a bit lean, to have good depth, clarity and seamlessness with the rest of the sonic picture.
BTW, for those who might ask, I am doing these listening comparisons with both solid state and valve amps (Parasound A-21 and Audio Research VT-100 respectively).
George
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - B&W Matrix 801 II and Quad ESL-63 Sound Question - George S. Roland 08:01:49 04/17/15 (12)
- Given that the B&W's very steep crossover slopes will affect all the attacks - Timbo in Oz 19:10:16 04/17/15 (8)
- RE: Given that the B&W's very steep crossover slopes will affect all the attacks - George S. Roland 22:18:03 04/17/15 (1)
- I am certian that B&W did a very good job of developing their once flagship speaker - Timbo in Oz 23:34:24 04/17/15 (0)
- Don't the 63s have MILES of wire in their delay line... - Steve O 19:26:02 04/17/15 (5)
- RE: Don't the 63s have MILES of wire in their delay line... - djk 22:50:19 04/17/15 (4)
- The delay line of the 63 is not a textbook allpass filter... - Steve O 09:57:44 04/18/15 (2)
- Gee - djk 22:16:44 04/19/15 (1)
- Same only at the highest conceptual level... - Steve O 13:17:37 04/20/15 (0)
- RE: Don't the 63s have MILES of wire in their delay line... - kentaja 07:30:31 04/18/15 (0)
- RE: B&W Matrix 801 II and Quad ESL-63 Sound Question - fin1bxn@msn.com 09:57:46 04/17/15 (2)
- RE: B&W Matrix 801 II and Quad ESL-63 Sound Question - George S. Roland 22:13:22 04/17/15 (1)
- Test tones and an analyzer - fin1bxn@msn.com 05:50:37 04/20/15 (0)