Home Speaker Asylum

General speaker questions for audio and home theater.

RE: Response at the crossover frequency

Thank you very much again for the very interesting explanation.
Personally i do not understand why the use the step response
I prefer the impulse response test because it is easier to see any unwanted tail in the driver response
I strongly believe in fast drivers, with high rise time e high damping after the impulse.
I understand that the x-over issue is a very tricky one ... not easy to achieve very good results. But also fascinating.
I would give active crossing a try anyway.
It is so easy to set cut freqs and even slopes in the digital ones.
The idea of using a driver only in the range where it can give its best
it sounds very good to me.
But it is not very popular i am afraid at least in home listening system.
Almost no one is using electronic x-overs.
There must be reasons.
Thanks again,
Kind regards,
beppe



Kind regards,
bg



Edits: 11/01/13 11/01/13

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  McShane Design  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
  • RE: Response at the crossover frequency - beppe61 01:54:49 11/01/13 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.