In Reply to: RE: Response at the crossover frequency posted by Belgarchi on October 31, 2013 at 20:47:42:
Thank you very much again for the very interesting explanation.
Personally i do not understand why the use the step response
I prefer the impulse response test because it is easier to see any unwanted tail in the driver response
I strongly believe in fast drivers, with high rise time e high damping after the impulse.
I understand that the x-over issue is a very tricky one ... not easy to achieve very good results. But also fascinating.
I would give active crossing a try anyway.
It is so easy to set cut freqs and even slopes in the digital ones.
The idea of using a driver only in the range where it can give its best
it sounds very good to me.
But it is not very popular i am afraid at least in home listening system.
Almost no one is using electronic x-overs.
There must be reasons.
Thanks again,
Kind regards,
beppe
Kind regards,
bg
Edits: 11/01/13 11/01/13
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Response at the crossover frequency - beppe61 01:54:49 11/01/13 (0)