In Reply to: RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A posted by the old school on May 14, 2012 at 22:22:31:
Old School,
Dude, no one is saying your IVs are not accurate or measure any worse than others speakers...hell they even made product of the year in Stereophile one year(that literally almost put John out of business - as he couldn't keep up with demand fast enough - his words not mine)...but moving up the Dunlavy ladder there are noticeable differences.
I even once ran into a guy that swore his Dunlavy IIs w/ a quality sub were the purist reproduction of music he had ever heard.
Conclusion - John made some great speakers, all of them for that matter!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - Mr_bill2 06:24:23 05/15/12 (5)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - the old school 21:42:30 05/15/12 (4)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - Mr_bill2 06:33:42 05/16/12 (3)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - Jack D II 10:48:02 05/16/12 (2)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - the old school 23:10:23 05/16/12 (1)
- The Difference Between Them is Probably Dwarfed by . . . - Brian A 18:47:12 05/18/12 (0)