In Reply to: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A posted by Rocky on May 14, 2012 at 16:05:49:
I have been using the Dunlavy SCIV speakers, along with my Fulton Js for decades. The Dunlavy SCIV measured as well or better than anything JA has EVER measured: flat response, perfect square wave, time coherent, efficient. NOTHING I heard at the 2010 or 2011 CAS shows equalled the SCIVs in accuracy.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - the old school 21:55:17 05/14/12 (8)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - Rocky 22:05:14 05/14/12 (7)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - the old school 22:22:31 05/14/12 (6)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - Mr_bill2 06:24:23 05/15/12 (5)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - the old school 21:42:30 05/15/12 (4)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - Mr_bill2 06:33:42 05/16/12 (3)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - Jack D II 10:48:02 05/16/12 (2)
- RE: A of Dunlavy SC-IV for sale but not SC-IV/A - the old school 23:10:23 05/16/12 (1)
- The Difference Between Them is Probably Dwarfed by . . . - Brian A 18:47:12 05/18/12 (0)