In Reply to: Of course they are posted by Todd B. on November 25, 2007 at 17:43:41:
the term phase and time in different aspects of disucssion and specifically did NOT say I have two time coherent units, but phase coherent. (One is time and one is not). But our local zealot uses phase coherent as his montra, and often uses time coherent interchangeably. I try very hard not to do that. Also I specifically state with multi driver non coincident units the term "time coherent at specified distance" to further define what I am refering to.
The problem with the financially and emotionally attached is they feel attacked. Not my intention, (well maybe a bit the the zealot as he earns it with posts like "upgrade?", when not having heard the alternative unit being discussed) I'll again say the oversimplified approach of one paramount aspect really does not generate a strong respect for the posters experience. And if you think this is a hard discussion with 1st order/time/phase minions, you should see what dealing with single driver or high efficient horn minions are like! They give new meaning to "my way or high way"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I know they are not the same and specifically and carefully include ... - Edp 15:43:08 11/26/07 (0)