Focal won, as you might expect, but not by much. It was the Polk LSI 15 vs the Focal 918, a $1500 speaker (Polk) matched against the $4000 Focal. The 918 was airier, more open, the Polk less so and more directional. During musical peaks (ex: Pavoratti's cresendos in Rodolpho's aria in the first act of La Boheme, London cd) both sounded strained at times, the result, perhaps, of the sales guy cranking up the volume of a 100/ch "mid-fi" amp. The speakers seemed evenly matched in bass extention and high end. Overall, though, the Focal was smoother, sweeter, warmer. Cost no object, I'd go with the Focal. Still, even though both fit my budget, I'd save the $2500 between the two and take home the Polk (more bang for the buck by far). (Too bad Tweeter didn't have the Focal 1027 bee in stock for a shoot-out between it and the 918, but that's for another store on another day).
I invite comments by those with a similar experience.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - speaker shoot-out at Tweeter - Polk vs Focal - mbmiller@bcpl.net 04:45:22 11/16/07 (12)
- RE: speaker shoot-out at Tweeter - Polk vs Focal - Bill the K 04:42:19 11/26/07 (0)
- RE: speaker shoot-out at Tweeter - Polk vs Focal - Chris R 18:44:02 11/19/07 (0)
- RE: slightly mystified... - mls-stl 13:17:10 11/16/07 (1)
- You got it right... - mbmiller@bcpl.net 14:06:12 11/16/07 (0)
- RE: speaker shoot-out at Tweeter - Polk vs Focal - Merle 09:10:55 11/16/07 (0)
- RE: speaker shoot-out at Tweeter - Polk vs Focal - HighEndWire 08:15:10 11/16/07 (1)
- RE: speaker shoot-out at Tweeter - Polk vs Focal - mbmiller@bcpl.net 14:12:59 11/16/07 (0)
- do you think... - mhardy6647 08:05:34 11/16/07 (1)
- Again... - mbmiller@bcpl.net 14:15:32 11/16/07 (0)
- This jives with my opinion that - G Squared 07:57:32 11/16/07 (0)
- Good post - Craiger56 07:31:13 11/16/07 (1)
- Yes, - mbmiller@bcpl.net 14:17:19 11/16/07 (0)