In Reply to: Re: End of November for the Four (nt) posted by Frank25 on October 12, 2005 at 09:03:52:
The answers are:d. All of the above.
In most instances, the Classic Four will provide a better musical experience than the Evolution because of the lower distortion, wide dispersion design. Evolutions do have an edge in bass performance, however.
Compared to a T5, the Four will have a more spacious, "open" sound and more resolution. The bass will likely have a little more "thump" on the Four, vs a more precisely tracked and rendered bass on the T5/T6. I suspect the Four will play marginally louder than the T5, but not quite as loud as the T6. I also suspect that few people will need or have interest in the X2/A1 add on.
They do compete with each other. The Evos are deemed to be more "custom installation" and the Classic is more "retail/audiophile"
Both speakers are high-end in their own way, the Evos being more forgiving of bad environments and the Classics making the most of good ones. Each has their own strengths.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Classic vs Evo..... - John Ashman 11:58:38 10/12/05 (6)
- Re: Classic vs Evo..... - Frank25 15:23:33 10/12/05 (3)
- Here's the one I lust after...... - John Ashman 15:29:00 10/12/05 (2)
- Re: Here's the one I lust after...... - Frank25 09:10:46 10/13/05 (1)
- well.... - John Ashman 18:39:51 10/13/05 (0)
- Re: Classic vs Evo..... - Frank25 15:20:01 10/12/05 (1)
- Yes, a definite upgrade from the 2.9 (nt) - John Ashman 15:26:34 10/12/05 (0)