In Reply to: Re: Oh . . . posted by Deckers1 on May 26, 2003 at 07:51:09:
The ones I have are the Walsh 2's not the 200 series, I figure they are about 10-15 yrs old. I know what you mean about the F's, a friends brother had a set of those with an appropriate amp and they just blew me away, I have been looking for a pair of those since then.
two ads in the paper has got me a pair of "L"'s and these, not "F"'s,
but really nice speakers for almost no money.
Surprisingly, my model "L"'s(3-way bookshelf) have better binding posts than the (more expensive) Walsh's.
I am at a loss to understand why Ohm isnt more well known and appreciated.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Oh . . . - justanotherguywithaquestion 15:46:43 05/26/03 (2)
- Re: Oh . . because it looks rediculous to someone who likes . . . . - Deckers1 23:47:30 05/26/03 (1)
- Which are you saying . . . - Hoho 08:20:28 05/27/03 (0)