In Reply to: Re: An alternative, viable. posted by Duke on May 26, 2003 at 11:59:37:
Linear effeciency is one area Duke they really excell in. The waveguide is almost 11" actually.. The finished surface area just beyond the guide is used and symetrical. They are doing an honest +/- 1dB from 100 to 15K and unlike all my early observations with effeciency meaning "lack of" equals compression and hyper sensitivity equaling some dynamic expansion, the engineers have managed to take drivers that are roughly greater than 90dB and seriously balance the crossover for minimal phase problems and minimal compression (if any). The V/C's are designed to burn out long before the drivers reach their physical limitations in travel and linearity so it is a most careful balancing act. Amazing that they give acuurate dynamic presentation at levels of 80/90/and 100dB, it just takes more juice to reach 85dB and the losses are balanced , giving them the strange and rare linear dynamics. They are rock solid to 30hZ but that is about it as far as being within the 2dB envelope. They are designed for near to mid field listening.Yes, they need more power than the average "joe" but they are far from average in presentation. I plan on a formal review in the near future. I don't want to give it all away it is just in the close to 30 years of this loudspeaker game, here is another product that breaks the molds of scientific thinking and does some things that I feel were impossable, as little as 2 years ago. I would not say they are "SET" friendly unless one wants to listen closely tucked in...then again, jazz combo recordings seem "live" at as little as 10 watts...but to make it "up front and center" to a live act, 500 a channel would be recommended.
Another interesting tradeoff Duke...but they are doing plenty of things that are most uncanny, considering my pasts beliefs.
Audio Asylum® Signature line: Hearing is believing.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: An alternative, viable. - RBP 13:56:41 05/26/03 (2)
- Once again, RBP, thanks for taking the time! - Duke 14:59:28 05/26/03 (1)
- Thanks ;) - RBP 15:25:44 05/26/03 (0)