Rocky Road

RE: Who ARE you ...

75.189.135.83

In Reply to: RE: lol posted by WW85 on April 12, 2008 at 17:15:22

Stephen Holden's brother-in-law or something?

I slammed the reporter?????

My post was about the Rolling Stones. ANOTHER poster mentioned Stephen Holden. I merely speculated, and admitted to speculating, that it might be difficult for Holden, for ANY reviewer of the music scene, to pan the Rolling Stones. You know, for a newspaper, things like access to celebrities, invitations to parties and premieres, advertising revenue for concert tours, film releases, little bread and butter items like that, influence the way big name acts are treated and reviewed.

This warranted a tirade against me personally?

My post was about the effete, shop-worn, mechanical performance of the Stones. They have become animitronic museum pieces. They either need to freshen things up, or throw in the towel, artistically. That's just my opinion. I'm entitled to it. I've bought enough of their records over the years. I've paid the price of admission, and I'll BOO if I want to.

Follow Ups:

I also noticed - WW85 20:45:58 04/12/08 (1)
- I case you haven't noticed ... - halfnote 21:00:30 04/13/08 (0)
A little bird - J 20:10:45 04/12/08 (1)
- RE: Little birds - halfnote 21:09:25 04/13/08 (0)

Post a Followup:

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.