In Reply to: Just tossing a casual question out here posted by bwkendall on July 15, 2003 at 10:56:19:
Just asking.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Why not the Jackson Five? - J 18:37:05 07/15/03 (18)
- Because they technically don't fall into the rock or rock-and-roll - bwkendall 09:32:22 07/16/03 (8)
- Everly Brothers? - J 10:43:20 07/16/03 (7)
- You wouldn't put them in the same vein as - bwkendall 10:55:09 07/16/03 (6)
- Re: You wouldn't put them in the same vein as - J 11:07:42 07/16/03 (5)
- Okay, I'll trade you one Everly Brothers for The Jacksons.... - bwkendall 11:13:56 07/16/03 (4)
- Yeah, well I'll raise you both some Osmonds (nt) - nobody 11:29:41 07/16/03 (3)
- I call! -t - bwkendall 13:15:29 07/16/03 (0)
- They were no Barnes & Barnes nt - J 12:00:14 07/16/03 (0)
- The Osmonds, by the way... - JefferyK 11:42:26 07/16/03 (0)
- Ok, forget I asked. Here's a few... - J 22:13:22 07/15/03 (8)
- Hey, J, you forgot Styx - DAT 09:00:38 07/18/03 (1)
- They'd already been mentioned... - J 09:14:54 07/18/03 (0)
- I'm a Skeeter fan, too... - JefferyK 11:41:22 07/16/03 (0)
- you good, dawg! don't think any siblings in the meters, though nt - gopher 10:38:43 07/16/03 (2)
- Arthur & Cyril Neville - J 10:42:08 07/16/03 (1)
- i stand humbly corrected, sir nt - gopger 12:59:07 07/16/03 (0)
- Excellent information.....you do know your stuff. -t - bwkendall 09:35:44 07/16/03 (0)
- Did I forget Sparks? - J 22:21:13 07/15/03 (0)