In Reply to: "You had me, but I never had you." Okay, I know he's a Beatle and all, but.... posted by tinear on February 2, 2012 at 09:59:55:
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- she gave birth but was not there for him, sad not creepy, regardless of exBeatle status - PhilJ 11:08:27 02/02/12 (6)
- Read up on John: he meant "had" in the usual context, Phil. nt - tinear 11:26:08 02/03/12 (0)
- RE: she gave birth but was not there for him, sad not creepy, regardless of exBeatle status - oldmkvi 15:40:49 02/02/12 (4)
- How "had you" can mean "wasn't there for me" is a mystery only the - tinear 11:34:53 02/03/12 (1)
- RE: How "had you" can mean "wasn't there for me" is a mystery only the - oldmkvi 08:47:23 02/04/12 (0)
- OMG! I actually had not thought of it that way! LOL! you may be right. - PhilJ 16:46:20 02/02/12 (1)
- "Scuse me..." Exactly! - oldmkvi 22:28:39 02/02/12 (0)