In Reply to: RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) posted by PAR on December 28, 2016 at 10:39:41:
Your points are plausible but we can only speculate about this operation without compelling evidence. That said, I'm not going to use them again.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - Berrell88 13:44:43 12/28/16 (10)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - fantja 14:47:57 12/28/16 (9)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - PAR 15:32:29 12/28/16 (8)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - fantja 05:54:32 12/29/16 (7)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - PAR 08:32:11 12/29/16 (6)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - fantja 12:18:22 12/29/16 (0)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - fantja 12:16:02 12/29/16 (4)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - PAR 15:10:54 12/29/16 (3)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - fantja 20:10:36 12/29/16 (0)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - fantja 18:09:47 12/29/16 (0)
- RE: Too appealing to be good, I guess. (NT) - fantja 18:08:22 12/29/16 (0)