In Reply to: RE: "Mahler's spare lines" posted by rbolaw on November 20, 2016 at 15:33:27:
FYI, here's Cooke's lecture given at the first performance of his "completion" (he doesn't call it that) of Mahler 10.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NqthgNuFF9Y
One point that Cooke makes is that the short score that Mahler left has some aspects that are new to his music, e.g., constantly changing time signatures in the scherzo. So one reason you might find the 10th unMahler-like is that Mahler had gone off in some new directions in this piece (as he did in the 9th, which has litte in common with the 8th).
Edits: 11/20/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "Mahler's spare lines" - pbarach 16:09:15 11/20/16 (0)