Home Music Lane

It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes.

WTF? Since when is not writing "easy listening" music a defect?

I only have 100 questions regarding this.

Exactly what defines "easy listening? Popularity? Whistling melodies after attending the 18th revival of Oklahoma? Using harmonic concepts that are hundreds of years old? Lack of dissonance defines "easy listening", or is dissonance ok as long as its not derived from a 12 tone concept? Serialism is horrific but atonal is ok? "Intellectual" concepts employed in composition are ok as long as it ain't 12 tone serialism? Mirror harmony/lines is fine but all 12 tone music bites a hot one?

Are all of Beethoven's quartets "easy listening" because they're tonal? How about Bartok's quartets? Or can those guys be excused for writing "hard listening" pieces because they'd already written music more palatable for the masses? Varese sucks due to lack of "easy listening" pieces? Where's Ligetti fit in? Walk around the house whistling melodies by Takemitsu? Guess his stuff sucks. Schnittke's ok because he showed he could write Bach-like sections?

I don't care for most 12 tone pieces I've heard, but I do enjoy some Webern, Berg and Schoenberg pieces that if not completely serial sure as hell were heavily influenced by the concept. There are also a helluva lot of tonal pieces that I find either boring as hell or worse, including some that you may love.

I don't judge music by popularity, simplicity/complexity, tonality/melodic content or lack thereof. My ears listen to *one piece at a time*, and I enjoy or dislike *individual* pieces. I may like one serial piece very much and never wanna hear another particular serial piece again. I can be bored stiff by the trite tonal harmony and lackluster orchestration of many pieces one could describe as "easy listening", and yet love Vaughn Williams' Fantasia On Greensleeves.

Ya know, only a truly tiny percentage of the world's population digs jazz. An even smaller percentage of that tiny slice enjoy MY music. Jeez, I can only dream of being as popular as Schoenberg :-)

BTW -- Learsfool did NOT say serialism was THE music of its time, he simply said it was music of its time. What else was it, music NOT of its time? He did NOT say "....the horrors of WWI can *only* be expressed through serialism." He said "Much of Berg's music in particular is unimaginable without the context of WWI."




Edits: 05/10/16 05/10/16

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Schiit Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.