In Reply to: Sorry no: the first two symphonies are charming and we'll leave it at that posted by jdaniel@jps.net on April 13, 2016 at 20:15:32:
The Bruckner First is unique in his cannon. It's different from all of the rest to a very large degree. All you need to do is listen. It's his first actual effort [after the "Study Symphony", which was just that - a composition exercise, not an actual creative effort], and the better you know it, the more amazing it sounds. Just listen to that 3rd theme group - so bold [3 theme groups in his 1st movement expositions being one of the stylistic innovations he'd keep in all of his future symphonies].
The Sym #2 is overall a weaker work, and not one that I'd expect to appeal to none Bruckner dedicated listeners. Indeed, I'd expect it to have very low appeal all around to the general listener. Still, for the dedicated Bruckner listener it has many beauties in it, especially in the *optimal* 1877 edition.
But, the Sym #1 is a special, and quite strong work.
Severius! Supremus Invictus
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Disagree - Newey 21:49:38 04/13/16 (7)
- Re: 2nd Symphony ... the slow mov't is lovely and one of the few times in which Bruckner IMHO isn't trying - jdaniel@jps.net 08:22:18 04/14/16 (5)
- Uh. . . which version of No. 1 were you listening to? Linz or Vienna? - Chris from Lafayette 10:07:43 04/14/16 (4)
- Vinyl Addicts - Newey 11:57:42 04/15/16 (3)
- "grate on my nerves." Like some of your posts... - oldmkvi 08:05:14 04/17/16 (2)
- RE: "Moniker." - Ivan303 18:05:13 04/18/16 (1)
- Used To Go By Severius! Supremus Invictus - Newey 20:59:34 04/18/16 (0)
- OK, you've inspired me to listen to the 1st again before bed. Jochum's FWIW. nt - jdaniel@jps.net 22:11:58 04/13/16 (0)