In Reply to: Yes, you said, "born during the 20th century (or just before)" posted by Chris from Lafayette on January 22, 2016 at 15:28:36:
... might be considered "second rate", don't you think? At least when compared to certain others who appear to be considered as the true Giants of classical music composition.
You know, those striding Giants. Bloody born and bred in the 18th and 19th. To whom we refer to on an almost daily basis, and who I suppose will always be thought of as the true "first rate" composers of legend and lore. It would seem that there are precious few of those guys around but we gotta draw the line somewhere, don't we?
Or, could I be wrong? Maybe I don't need no stinkin' lines? I honestly can't decide what to do.
With such a shortage of "first rate" composers in this world, one might think that a fleaweight like Boulez would have dodged the issue.
So, I thought I'd ask you about this. Thanks for replying.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Great, but all of the composers you've just mentioned... - genungo 16:52:47 01/22/16 (1)
- I suppose one needs a certain critical mass among audiences, academicians and performers to be considered great - Chris from Lafayette 19:29:08 01/22/16 (0)