In Reply to: Permanent--OK. In my book, that leaves open "For better, or worse?" posted by John Marks on August 16, 2015 at 15:59:07:
John, I must disagree. The influence was very much the other way around - Prokofiev was very influenced by Stravinsky, as has just about every composer after Stravinsky. Prokofiev studied Stravinsky's scores a great deal, and was very jealous of him and his success. Stravinsky was much like his close friend Pablo Picasso - he could do anything, in any style, with ease; and like Picasso, still had incredible vitality and creativity until his dying day. Only Mozart is really comparable to him in all of music history in this respect - being able to write in pretty much every musical form. Stravinsky's influence on music, especially in the areas of rhythm and harmony, has been far beyond Prokofiev's, or Debussy's, for that matter. I do agree with you that Messiaen is underrated, though he will not approach Stravinsky's status.
Stravinsky's book, Poetics of Music, has also been very influential in the world of aesthetics.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Permanent--OK. In my book, that leaves open "For better, or worse?" - learsfool 21:00:58 08/17/15 (12)
- Huh? - Chris from Lafayette 23:20:12 08/17/15 (11)
- RE: Huh? - learsfool 16:25:31 08/18/15 (7)
- RE: Huh? - Chris from Lafayette 00:23:38 08/19/15 (5)
- RE: Huh? - learsfool 16:08:27 08/20/15 (4)
- RE: Huh? - learsfool 06:03:45 08/21/15 (3)
- Yup! - I certainly agree with that! ;-) - Chris from Lafayette 08:20:40 08/21/15 (2)
- RE: Yup! - I certainly agree with that! ;-) - learsfool 20:52:45 08/22/15 (1)
- We've got tickets for the Mariinsky doing Cinderella in Berkeley on Oct. 3 [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 17:55:18 08/24/15 (0)
- Well said. - rbolaw 18:17:28 08/18/15 (0)
- RE: Huh? - rbolaw 07:14:13 08/18/15 (2)