In Reply to: Wow. posted by rbolaw on July 22, 2015 at 17:11:12:
We have these dunderhead musicologists who get their hands on a particular treatise and instantly become enamored of it to the extent that they start to believe/claim that it explains EVERYTHING from the period of history in which it was written! How stupid! Let's do a little thought experiment. . . What if Lang Lang wrote a treatise on piano playing in the twenty-first century? I can just see some future musicologist now, pouring through the pages and noting that pianists must have played with swaying torsos and flying elbows - all the while pedaling in their Lang Lang Addidas shoes! :-)
The obvious problem with this approach is that there is WAY more diversity of playing (technique and interpretation) than any one treatise can account for at any particular period in time.
BTW, I wonder how up we all are for another discussion of vibrato. There's been another discussion over on Google Groups in which Dave Hurwitz has announced that he's presented his ideas on historical vibrato (which largely agree with mine) at several musicological conferences, and that he is about to travel to Italy to present his contentions at another of these conferences. He used to have a couple of large articles available on the Classics Today web site on this subject, but he has temporarily taken them down in order to elaborate them and to properly footnote them for scholarly use. God bless you, Dave! Let's stop this sack-cloth-and-ashes non-vibrato madness while we still can! ;-)
The proper and correct way to play the piano in the twenty-first century.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Here's the problem - Chris from Lafayette 18:03:26 07/22/15 (18)
- Considering that the modern piano is little more that a loud, heavy... - Ivan303 07:05:47 07/23/15 (0)
- RE: Here's the problem - jazz1 22:36:55 07/22/15 (5)
- RE: Here's the problem - Chris from Lafayette 11:19:10 07/23/15 (4)
- RE: Here's the problem - rbolaw 13:49:28 07/23/15 (3)
- RE: Here's the problem - learsfool 08:40:18 07/26/15 (0)
- Yes, I think you make some truly valid points - Chris from Lafayette 17:36:16 07/23/15 (1)
- RE: Yes, I think you make some truly valid points - rbolaw 20:20:15 07/23/15 (0)
- RE: Here's the problem - Analog Scott 20:38:24 07/22/15 (0)
- How to treat treatises - rbolaw 18:44:05 07/22/15 (3)
- "We can never return to them, only learn from them" - Chris from Lafayette 18:58:05 07/22/15 (2)
- I Know Your Post Is Correct Because I Agree With It Wholeheartedly. -=ahem=- - Charlie F. 10:41:09 07/27/15 (1)
- LOL! I love your post! Double harrumph!! [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 13:47:51 07/27/15 (0)
- I would have used Yuja Wang as my example, - srl1 18:18:55 07/22/15 (5)
- I'm not holding my breath for a treatise from her, either. ;-) nt - rbolaw 18:50:08 07/22/15 (2)
- Just give her time - Chris from Lafayette 19:05:01 07/22/15 (1)
- I'd believe anything she says! - Pat D 03:58:06 07/23/15 (0)
- Funny you should mention Yuja. . . - Chris from Lafayette 18:36:13 07/22/15 (1)
- RE: Funny you should mention Yuja. . . - Analog Scott 20:31:49 07/22/15 (0)