In Reply to: Another musicologist strikes again with his usual total stupidity [nt] posted by Chris from Lafayette on July 22, 2015 at 13:06:14:
Hostile to anything that challenges the modern orthodoxy, are we? ;-) Actually, a major problem with trying to resurrect Mozartean piano technique, or at least so it seems to me, is that the pianoforte of Mozart's day, not overstrung, with a wood frame and leather covered hammers, and without the modern mechanism developed by Erard and others, was an entirely different instrument.
What we now consider the piano is a late nineteenth century instrument that began to evolve towards its current form in the early to mid-19th century, long after Mozart died (and shortly after Beethoven died). And much as we might hate to admit it, the instrument continues to evolve, including with modern electronics (shudder!).
Of course, Christina Kolb, the pianist of the NY Times article, demonstrates on an early 19th century pianoforte, or a modern replica thereof. I don't doubt such an instrument required a very different technique, though I haven't played one myself.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Wow. - rbolaw 17:11:12 07/22/15 (19)
- Here's the problem - Chris from Lafayette 18:03:26 07/22/15 (18)
- Considering that the modern piano is little more that a loud, heavy... - Ivan303 07:05:47 07/23/15 (0)
- RE: Here's the problem - jazz1 22:36:55 07/22/15 (5)
- RE: Here's the problem - Chris from Lafayette 11:19:10 07/23/15 (4)
- RE: Here's the problem - rbolaw 13:49:28 07/23/15 (3)
- RE: Here's the problem - learsfool 08:40:18 07/26/15 (0)
- Yes, I think you make some truly valid points - Chris from Lafayette 17:36:16 07/23/15 (1)
- RE: Yes, I think you make some truly valid points - rbolaw 20:20:15 07/23/15 (0)
- RE: Here's the problem - Analog Scott 20:38:24 07/22/15 (0)
- How to treat treatises - rbolaw 18:44:05 07/22/15 (3)
- "We can never return to them, only learn from them" - Chris from Lafayette 18:58:05 07/22/15 (2)
- I Know Your Post Is Correct Because I Agree With It Wholeheartedly. -=ahem=- - Charlie F. 10:41:09 07/27/15 (1)
- LOL! I love your post! Double harrumph!! [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 13:47:51 07/27/15 (0)
- I would have used Yuja Wang as my example, - srl1 18:18:55 07/22/15 (5)
- I'm not holding my breath for a treatise from her, either. ;-) nt - rbolaw 18:50:08 07/22/15 (2)
- Just give her time - Chris from Lafayette 19:05:01 07/22/15 (1)
- I'd believe anything she says! - Pat D 03:58:06 07/23/15 (0)
- Funny you should mention Yuja. . . - Chris from Lafayette 18:36:13 07/22/15 (1)
- RE: Funny you should mention Yuja. . . - Analog Scott 20:31:49 07/22/15 (0)