In Reply to: RE: Big surprise - NOT: HIPsters have vibrato all WRONG (according to The Strad) posted by learsfool on February 22, 2015 at 22:48:14:
That 2001 New Grove article (which I won't quote yet again) is a reflection of the true state of HIP performances with regard to vibrato.
It's disingenuous to say that you don't know any early music player who plays totally without vibrato - sure, they may use a tiny amount of vibrato on a note here and there, but they never use the amount which would occur naturally in singing. In fact, as I've argued before, you often have these absurd HIP performances (I've seen some by McGegan himself) where the vocal soloists are singing with their natural vibrato, while the strings' vibrato is rationed in a quasi-totalitarian way. As I say, the contrast is absurd! I can't believe that even knowledgeable listeners like you, rbolaw, and C.B take this style of performance seriously.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The artificial lack of vibrato is instantly recognizeable in HIP performances - Chris from Lafayette 08:34:15 02/23/15 (9)
- RE: The artificial lack of vibrato is instantly recognizeable in HIP performances - learsfool 21:17:07 02/23/15 (8)
- Modern string players are WAY closer - Chris from Lafayette 23:50:33 02/23/15 (7)
- RE: Modern string players are WAY closer - learsfool 21:14:53 02/24/15 (4)
- A modern orchestra sounds fundamentally different - Chris from Lafayette 00:18:01 02/25/15 (3)
- RE: A modern orchestra sounds fundamentally different - learsfool 22:59:56 02/25/15 (2)
- I'm speaking in generalities with regard to strings - Chris from Lafayette 17:32:09 02/26/15 (1)
- RE: I'm speaking in generalities with regard to strings - learsfool 21:08:01 02/26/15 (0)
- RE: Modern string players are WAY closer - Travis 07:52:52 02/24/15 (1)
- Poor demented souls! [nt] - Chris from Lafayette 09:34:06 02/24/15 (0)