|
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
|
|
|
Music Lane It's all about the music, dude! Sit down, relax and listen to some tunes. |
|
In Reply to: You're behind the times. posted by Rick W on December 3, 2014 at 16:50:49:
I know mono is considered better for many early jazz records and the Beatles, for example, but isn't that mainly because such a crappy job was done with the stereo versions?
And the Fantastique isn't my favorite Berlioz piece, either. But it is interesting to hear Monteux do it as he's only one remove from the composer.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- OK, I'll try harder. - rbolaw 21:06:08 12/03/14 (11)
- RE: OK, I'll try harder. - bald2 11:01:11 12/04/14 (1)
- RE: OK, I'll try harder. - Utley1 18:38:13 12/04/14 (0)
- RE: OK, I'll try harder. - Rick W 22:20:15 12/03/14 (8)
- RE: OK, I'll try harder. - David Smith 20:02:11 12/06/14 (2)
- RE: OK, I'll try harder. - bald2 07:15:00 12/15/14 (0)
- RE: OK, I'll try harder. - bald2 08:31:20 12/14/14 (0)
- RE: OK, I'll try harder. - rbolaw 07:52:37 12/04/14 (4)
- "Found" a record I didn't remember I had, Scherchen - mwhitmore 11:07:42 12/05/14 (0)
- I'm much more tolerant of bad jazz recordings than bad symphonic recordings. - Rick W 09:31:10 12/04/14 (1)
- classical mono - rbolaw 11:20:11 12/04/14 (0)
- RE: OK, I'll try harder. - Travis 08:48:37 12/04/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
