In Reply to: RE: You know what? posted by David Smith on November 9, 2014 at 14:36:48:
"I don't think this is that difficult. If there is no point in using it but to compensate for the ability to 'really sing' as you suggest, how does that square with it being used on Sinatra unless your claim is that he couldn't sing either?"
In case you didn't know, David, changing the context of what someone says, expressly to project an impression that the person stated something different from what he actually said, is also a form of deceit. Willful deceit. Deceit of the worst kind. I'm not going to let you get away with that.
The only thing you've accomplished here, David, was showcase what an absolute jerk you really are.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: You know what? - Todd Krieger 15:02:29 11/09/14 (14)
- I have no interest/need for deceit - David Smith 15:53:32 11/09/14 (13)
- RE: I have no interest/need for deceit - Analog Scott 09:17:28 11/10/14 (8)
- RE: I have no interest/need for deceit - Todd Krieger 20:10:49 11/10/14 (7)
- OMG rbolaw and I have been...................EXPOSED! - Rick W 09:47:16 11/11/14 (0)
- That's what you would say? Kind of like - David Smith 21:03:30 11/10/14 (5)
- You're Cracking Up............. - Todd Krieger 00:28:44 11/11/14 (3)
- RE: You're Cracking Up............. - David Smith 06:09:27 11/11/14 (2)
- RE: You're Cracking Up............. - Todd Krieger 07:56:44 11/11/14 (1)
- a pattern is emerging - GEO 09:14:57 11/11/14 (0)
- RE: That's what you would say? Kind of like - Analog Scott 21:12:01 11/10/14 (0)
- RE: I have no interest/need for deceit - Todd Krieger 16:20:47 11/09/14 (3)
- Ok - David Smith 16:53:12 11/09/14 (2)
- Isn't there a high G# somewhere you should be practicing? - Rick W 17:28:06 11/09/14 (1)
- I used to practice - David Smith 17:55:26 11/09/14 (0)